Joseph O’Neill is one of America’s very best novelists under 50 years of age. His super–critically acclaimed third novel, “Netherland,” has been compared to “The Great Gatsby,” mainly because its main character, like Gatsby, meets a watery gangsterish death. What has been less discussed is perhaps the hardest thing to talk about when we talk about fiction, i.e., O’Neill’s masterly writing style, his absolutely awesome technique.
I haven’t the space or the inclination to describe what I mean in detail. Suffice it to say here that Angela Elam’s half-hour interview has enough snippets from “Netherland” for listeners to appreciate the magnificence of O’Neill’s sentences. Without in the least overwriting and filling his pages with purple prose, O’Neill puts together the building blocks of a novel whose sentences have the symphonic aura of Richard Ford’s, the panache of Zadie Smith’s and the subtlety of William Trevor’s.
“Netherland” is about the post–World Trade Center underworld of Third World people who play cricket in New York City. O’Neill is a terrifically artful reader of his own work. Plus, he evinces plenty of street smarts and good old-fashioned charm in his give and take with Elam. I for one had no idea he speaks with a British accent. But forget Churchill and Colonel Blimp: O’Neill is thoroughly a man of our time.
This “New Letters on the Air” interview is thoroughly enlightening, entertaining—just what you’ll want to hear at the outset of our brave new decade!
How good to learn that WTIP licensed this piece! No, WTIP is not a big-city station. It’s located on the southern “tip” of Lake Superior. James McIntosh’s ruminations about the year 2009 will be heard by a few thousand people in northern Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and southern Ontario.
On this New Year’s it’s pleasant to think of McIntosh’s piece being pondered by no-nonsense northerners. February is still a good way off, but for millions of us south of Lake Woebegone it’s already, in the words of the Christmas carol, “the bleak mid-winter.” Shall we bless or blame 2009 and, by implication, the aught decade which is fast becoming history?
Whereas most of us have heard George Santayana’s famous quip, “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it,” McIntosh quotes another George—Bernard Shaw: “We learn from history that we learn nothing from history.”
If nothing can be learned from history except the notion that history can teach us nothing, then it follows that we need to light out on our own, fare forward anew as if for the first time and view the present moment with, as one poet put it, “the hottest fire of sight.” As McIntosh puts it, “Experience is hindsight with enough bite to influence the future.”
Far be it from me to disagree with the sagacious Robert Karl Skoglund aka the Humble Farmer when he says, “James McIntosh is always worth hearing.”
In his latest interstitial, with his usual perverse humor, McIntosh identifies laziness as the motivating force for change in our free-enterprise rat race—or should I say car show? It was a lazy person, McIntosh contends, who invented power steering. Laziness, he might agree, made room for the World Wide Web and such easy-to-use programs as Google, which have all but done away with arduous searches in sweatshops like the Encyclopedia Britannica.
I’ve been waiting, lazy as a lizard, for McIntosh’s minute-long commentaries to be licensed by a major station like Chicago’s WBEZ. Apparently, the good people responsible for programming at WBEZ—and WNYC—are too busy working hard to savor the benefits of laziness or heed the bard Walt Whitman when he said, “I loaf and invite my soul.”
What a busy bee I’ve been. My comment has already gone on longer than McIntosh’s.
More than any travel agent or tour guide, world-traveler Jake Warga is aware of poignant contradictions in various ports of call. In his latest sojourn in the Holy Land, he lets us know that in 2009 Mary and Joseph would not be permitted to enter Bethlehem for Jesus’s birth because both would be Jews unable to cross the checkpoint between Israel and the Occupied Territories. “Jews, “ Warga lets us know, “are not allowed into Bethlehem, the birthplace of the world’s most famous Jew. “
Isaac, we learn from Warga, is the Hebrew word for “He laughs,” and Ishmael for “He weeps.”
As neither a Jew nor a Muslim, Warga uses his mic to record the dead-serious non-laughter of an Israeli woman speaking of Jerusalem’s Colindia checkpoint and, implicitly, of all walls dividing people: “It’s just bad news all around. Can’t put a fence around yourself and have people living in the third world five minutes from your home.”
Warga asks an Arab taxi driver if he speaks Hebrew, and, rather than weeping like his forebear Ishmael, the driver grouses, “No, I don’t speak Jewish.”
These are only a few of this piece’s many rewards. Although we don’t get to see the evidence here, Warga is a superb photographer whose visual images capture the gritty essence of places like Guatemala, Rwanda and Norfolk Island off the coast of Australia.
His script for this piece is an offbeat ear-opener perfect for the winter holiday season—and suitable all year round.
Lately, the City of the Big Shoulders has had to flex its muscles, along with most every other burg in the United States. West Pullman in south Chicago has been suffering from urban blight long before the Great Recession. Tucked between Midway and Gary, Indiana’s airports, West Pullman is one of those prairie enclaves replete with vacant industrial parks and for-sale signs on foreclosed houses—
except for a pilot project to produce solar panels that could power-up 1200 homes, a project located right next door to beautiful downtown West Pullman.
Gabriel Spitzer’s interview with energy giant Exelon’s Tom O’Neill isn’t terribly artsy. If this report sometimes sounds cut-and-dry, it’s actually not. O’Neill is heading up what could become “the largest urban solar power plant in the nation.” Gazing out over acres of solar panels, he says the panels look “like a series of conference tables that if you were a little taller you could stand up and put your drink on and talk.”
I’d call that a doozy of an image.
Of course, for Exelon’s project to go from West Pullman to homes all over Hog Butcher Land and elsewhere, significant help will have to come from the city of Chicago, as well as from the feds. Well, things are looking good so far. The time seems riper than ever for a solar energy boom—
and, as everyone knows, you don’t have to be a reporter for Chicago Public Radio’s fabled WBEZ to realize that another term for “solar energy boom” is J-O-Bs.
This piece has been five-starred by two topnotch authorities in Raymond Carver Land: Carver’s son, Vance Lindsay, as well as Carol Sklenicka, whose new biography, “Raymond Carver: A Writer’s Life,” was today listed among the New York Times Book Review’s ten best books of 2009.
After such stellar endorsements, here are my two cents:
Carver was, as a man and in terms of his writing, a major person for me. His short story, “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love,” is part of the American literary canon. As usual—consider the case of “Julia Child and M. F. K. Fisher”—Leet-Ford and Litwin’s production of this piece is a kind of national treasure.
PDs may want to consider the significance of “love” in this story. If it’s true that, as four Liverpudlians sang, “All you need is love,” this story’s protagonist Mel, a cardiologist, has plenty to say about essential matters of the heart. His tipsy tip sheet abounds with unfoolish inconsistencies in subplots you will chuckle and frown over. The two married couples sitting down for drinks before dinner in Albuquerque discuss what it means to “love one another” in terms no one—certainly not Hemingway—ever brought out of the woodwork. In fact, the four main characters in this story, plus another quartet of characters mentioned “offstage,” are part of a late twentieth-century wallpaper design every American will recognize as part of his or her unique and solitary home.
I don’t agree with the host Herbert Gold’s statement that parental discretion is advised when airing this piece. I think young people need to know more about Shakespeare’s notion that the course of true love never did run smooth. I think people of all ages will want to make space in their day to listen to this piece and give it five stars.
James McIntosh has always had a dark side. In producing his “Nonsense at Work” series, his comments have ranged from being disgruntled to irreverent. As a curmudgeon he takes pleasure in waking us up to the sometimes nightmarish, sometimes ridiculous activities that fill our workaday lives.
Lately, I’ve worried a bit about him. Perhaps due to the effects of the global recession, he has replaced his publicity photo. Previously, his photo depicted him as an intense guy with a fashionably scruffy beard, in an open-collared white shirt and sports jacket, seated, with his face supported by his right hand, in a position vaguely resembling that of Rodin’s “Thinker.”
Perhaps in synch with the global recession, his new photo shows him in an almost shabby stovepipe hat with a white shirt, bow tie and dark suit jacket. What disturbs me most is his grim facial expression. He looks a bit like W. C. Fields on the skids.
All of which would be innocuous if the subject of McIntosh’s comment under review here weren’t suicide in the workplace. With a huge dollop of black humor, McIntosh asks, “Have you seen any good suicides at work lately?” He then proceeds to contrast Americans, who kill their bosses and coworkers, as opposed to French workers, who kill themselves. Since 2008 24 workers at a particular French business establishment have committed suicide.
I wonder whether suicide occurs as frequently in Japanese places of business, as well as in Scandinavia. Be that as it may, I’m concerned about McIntosh, whose polished British accent hardly hints at the emotional pain he mentions toward the end of this one-minute wakeup call. Thanksgiving, he says, may be a wonderful, life-affirming holiday for people with family and friends. In contrast, “Please spare a thought for those in pain,” he beseeches us.
Well, here’s my penny’s worth of thought for—as the Beatles would say—all the lonely people, possibly including the producer of this piece.
For years Cheryl-Anne Millsap has been broadcasting from the Inland Northwest. It’s good to see a hefty bunch of her recent pieces for Spokane Public Radio have been uploaded onto PRX—and good to hear her clear voice again.
In this drop-in, her personal essay about her grandfather has the sentimental warmth of a fireside chat. Her piece is titled “The Poetry of Carl Sandburg,” but it’s more a tribute to her bookish grandpa than to the author of “Chicago Poems.” Millsap begins, “My grandfather was a good man,” and she returns to this line as a refrain and her central theme.
It turns out that one of the main reasons Millsap’s granddad was a good man is that he “gave [Millsap] a good start,” i.e., he gave her Sandburg’s “poetry and steel mills and train cars and ordinary people.” It would have been excellent if Millsap had quoted a few lines from one or two of Sandburg’s poems. Failing this, she leaves us to make the connection between poems like “Fog” or “Gone” and her own plainspoken writing style, as well as her own down-home vision of ordinary life.
Who knows what kind of writer Millsap might have become if her grandpa had read poems to her by T. S. Eliot or Wallace Stevens? Let’s leave that question unanswered for now—and enjoy her words from a place that could hardly be called a “hog butcher for the world,” eastern Washington state’s Lilac City!
In the mid-1980s poet Alice Fulton, from Troy, NY, wrote about the vanished glory of her stamping grounds, named for the fabled ancient city near Athens. Today’s Trojan Wars have more to do with battling poverty than doing Homeric deeds of valor on the battlefield. Today’s “Trojan Women” is not a 2600-year-old tragedy by Euripides about widows whose husbands were killed in war. On the contrary, today’s story involves women, often single mothers, who face homelessness and a slavery unknown to the ancient Greeks.
Susan B.A. Somers-Willet’s prose-poem script for this intense radio dialogue relies on a female office worker asking a sequence of standard questions to a 25-year-old mother, Billie Jean Hill, who has lost her job and is seeking financial assistance. Again and again, the office worker, in polished bureaucratic English, repeats the refrain, “Did you know?” while her client mutters an interior monologue of answers in the dialect of the street.
For example, the woman behind the desk asks, “Do you or anyone who lives with you have cash on hand?” To which the client silently answers, “Who would actually tell ‘em that?”
If Somers-Willet’s poem sounds surreal, the scary reality is that every single question in her poem is drawn verbatim from the forms and flyers at the New York State Office of Temporary Assistance. The fact is, we “don’t know” the formulaic questions asked by staff members working to dole out “TA,” temporary assistance. We don’t know what kind of Kafkaesque rigmarole goes on in these offices, and we need to know these things.
This stellar piece was done as a multimedia event involving photographs as well as interviews and poetry in connection with one of America’s topnotch literary magazines, The Virginia Quarterly Review.
So far this piece has been licensed by three radio stations. It deserves to be licensed by at least thirty stations.
What could be better for November 26th than Guy Hand’s six-minute discourse on what we love most about Thanksgiving, food?
Idaho good-old-boy Guy Hand doesn’t say much about Idaho mashed potatoes and turkey. He has a mouthful of things to say about the pungent Mediterranean lettuce known as arugula. Even if his tongue twists around the word so that he continually mispronounces it while some of his interviewees pronounce it correctly, he knows what he’s talking about. No red-meat-eating, pickup-truck-driving, barn-owl-loving Gem Stater would trade his store-bought plastic-wrapped iceberg lettuce for a fancy-schmancy bitter Italian plant whose name he can’t pronounce. For that matter, Hand mispronounces the word “restaurateur”!
In the Pacific Northwest you can get away with pronouncing Rush Limbaugh as “God.” Which makes Hand’s piece funnier than a barrel of Sarah Palins scarfing brie and chablis at the Poetry Society of Boise. Hand handily edits his ruminations — chewing his cud — into a tasty concoction that may be closer to a blue-plate special than a foodies’ feast. But there’s enough here to please both Volvo-driving, Trader-Joe’s-going, garbanzo-bean-munching vegans and Wal-Mart-loving, Jim-Beam-swilling, Glock-pistol-packing carnivores.
This piece is more than a bit long in the tooth. Producer William Hammack describes the Concorde as “soon to stop flying.” He uses the present tense to say that the Concorde “flies higher and faster than any other commercial jet.”
Unless my memory disappeared off the radar screen, the Concorde stopped flying in 2003. Hammack apparently dusted off this drop-in and uploaded it onto PRX without the P.S. that its subject is nearly seven years out of date.
Still, Hammack is right on target when he says that today “with cell phones, cheap long distance service, and express mail, there are many times where a person can just stay put, instead of hop a continent.”
I’ve noticed that Hammack is an enormously prolific producer. He’s uploaded dozens of pieces onto PRX.
This is one of them that should have stayed put in an archive. Without at least a footnote, it doesn’t fly.
Although our current U.S. Poet Laureate Kay Ryan’s work is chiseled and granite-like – far from “confessional” or sentimental – this interview abounds with heartfelt personal details.
Ryan talks about how, while she was biking across the country in 1976, she heard a disembodied voice answer her silent question about becoming a poet with “Do you like it?” She talks about her father, a dreamer, who died prematurely while he was away from home, reading a get-rich-quick book at a motel. Most poignantly, she talks about how her “life partner” Carol died earlier this year, happy about Ryan’s accepting the poet laureateship partly because it offset the horror of her own death by cancer.
Then, too, Ryan muses about the ups and downs of her career, which was slow to take off; this will give hope to many aspiring poets listening to her success story. Her first book, supported by a group of Carol’s friends who got together and anteed up funds, was self-published. Ryan was no less than 50 years old when her first poem was published in “The New Yorker.” She was lying in bed reading the papers one Sunday morning when Carol pointed out one of Ryan’s poems quoted in “Boondocks” in the funnies – at which point Ryan felt as though she’d really “arrived” as a writer.
Everything that I’ve read by Ryan that has struck me as flinty and cold on the page gives way in this terrific interview from the long-standing topnotch Kansas City series, “New Letters on the Air.” Ryan ends up sounding like my image of Emily Dickinson on a fine Amherst morning.
Voyage with Steve Webb on the murky if fairly well charted waters of Mortgage Zee (to borrow the Dutch term). The less you know about sailing, the more you’ll learn from Webb’s guide for seafarers. As usual with Webb’s audio segments from the Real Estate Today series, this one is as lively as a pirate, with an Irish-sounding mariner’s tune as background music, plus the lilt of Webb’s crisp British accent to keep us awake.
Once again, as in his piece about renting versus buying a house, there’s a sort of disconnect between the current economic doldrums and the brisk wind in Webb’s sails — or sales talk. It’s all fitting and proper that we know about the p’s and q’s of credit ratings when applying for a mortgage. My guess, however, is that most public-radio listeners are already familiar with this material. Much as I admire Webb’s blithe spirit, I wonder about the ultimate value of his Coldwell Banker approach, given the complexities of the real estate scene in 2009.
Dry land can be fraught with bumpy roads, after all. But the pitfalls of terra firma don’t appear to interest Cap’n Webb. Toward the end of this piece his Irish-sounding background music segues to “Anchors Aweigh,” leaving us happily if a bit queasily at sea.
What could be more spine tingling for Halloween than a rebroadcast of Orson Welles’s famous radio play, “The Invasion from Mars”? Most Americans know the grisly story of its initial airing on October 30, 1938. Although Welles prefaced his production with a statement that “The Invasion” was a play, at least a million listeners were so persuaded by the power of his drama that they thought Martians were indeed invading the Earth. As a result, the Golden Age of Radio turned into One Huge Dollop of Panic, One Chaotic Evening of More than Trick or Treating.
I for one have never heard “The Invasion from Mars,” and I’d welcome bending an ear to it on Halloween eve. If it were aired, Dick Meister’s introduction would be must-hear material. Even though more than 71 years have elapsed, making the audio quality of Welles’s premiere sound a bit antique, I’d bet that, without Meister’s sage and salty introduction, thousands of people listening to “The Invasion” would go berserk in 2009 just as they did prior to World War Two. After all, we are still involved in at least one war that spans a great deal of the world. We are still as gullible as ever.
I only wish Meister’s elocution were crisper and clearer. He’s a terrific journalist but not expert at reading his script aloud in front of a mic.
Small potatoes when you consider the giant jack-o’-lantern “The Invasion” would be if it were rebroadcast on Saturday night October 31, 2009.
Once again I’ve “clicked” with John Tynan. The other day I responded fully to a monologue he uploaded onto PRX about his shaved head. Today I’m marveling at his homage to the creative spirit. My poem, “The Piano Tuner,” in a recent issue of “The Atlantic Monthly,” harmonizes with what Tynan says about his piano tuner, Kevin Jenkins. (Is this weird synchronicity or what?)
Jenkins calls himself a “piano psychologist” who listens to people’s stories like a “shrink” at least as intently as he does to their pianos. Many of Jenkins’s clients regret having sold or given away their pianos. They’ve lost something of great value in their lives.
At this point in his energetic, easygoing way Tynan talks about how he used to enjoy playing piano at his grandmother’s house in Tucson; how his improvising at the keyboard was a peak experience; how it’s not necessary to take lessons and learn to be a concert pianist for us to experiment and have fun at the keyboard. In our striving to master the art of this and that, Tynan suggests that we’ve lost something extremely valuable, that is, the ability to enjoy music innocently and to trust our own musical instincts.
“People really can play the piano, regardless of their abilities. They should enjoy playing the piano,” he says finally while a beautiful bare-bones melody — half-Satie, half-Fauré? — begins to take over in the background. But this is not Satie, not Fauré. The music is being improvised by Tynan, or perhaps Jenkins, who, unselfconscious about whether he’s a “great” musician or not, is in perfect tune with — to quote my poem — Pythagoras and the stars.
First there was Yul Brynner. Then there was Michael Jordan. Now there’s John Tynan.
I go along with the notion that bald is beautiful because, I, too, went into the bathroom one Sunday afternoon — like John Tynan — and shaved my head. It’s been a few years, and neither my wife nor I have any regrets about my follicular decision.
But enough about me! Tynan’s lilting, half-lugubrious, half-joyous description of the day he decided to trim his locks is a kind of tone poem. Sure, he had trouble cutting and shaving the back of his head viewed through a mirror. Sure, he had fantasies of ramming a cap over his botched tonsure job and sneaking over to a barbershop to have his hair-mowing finished so he didn’t look like a half-hairy ape. Sure, he suffered the anxiety of anybody about to make a clean cut with the past and begin anew with vigor and a shiny pate.But he seems to have loved the process, and the smile on his face in the photo accompanying his PRX piece attests to this.
Two teensy problems — and maybe I missed something vis-à-vis the first: Tynan makes much ado about using a safety razor and a pair of scissors. The sound track, however, is abuzz with an electric razor. This tiny ingrown hair, as it were, doesn’t prevent the sound track from being as playful and inventive as anything you’d want to hear, given the subject.
My second quibble has to do with the piece’s being a couple of minutes too long. After four minutes Tynan’s shtick begins to sound as though it, like Tynan’s hair mop, could be cut.
Despite the “South Pacific” song, “I’m Gonna Wash That Man Right Outta My Hair,” there’s nothing quite like “Bald”! It’d be perfect to air during National Shearling Month!
¡Qué buenas notícias para la nación conocida, desafortunadamente, en el modismo, “Salir de Guatemala y meterse en guatepeor”! En el pequeño país sur de México, en el Quiché, va a abrir el centro universitario el enero que viene, y van a haber 400 estudiantes peleando contra la ignorancia y la pobreza.
Aunque este programa sea no más conferencia de prensa, significa muchísimo. Ya que el crimen haya contribuido a una vida peligrosa tanto en las ciudades como en el campo Guatemalteco, las palabras de los dos educadores Lisandro Antillon y Edgar Vinicio Marroquin Rosas me dan más que un poquito de esperanza.
Por eso les digo a los maestros y a los alumnus, con todo el corazon, “¡Buena suerte al centro universitario de Quiché, Guatemala!”
There’s plenty to admire in Steve Webb’s monologue about real estate. First of all, it’s not merely a monologue. Webb expertly intersperses his remarks with amusing sound effects. At the outset, for example, he uses crashing musical chords to emphasize his being a member of “Rentaholics Anonymous,” and the result resembles something like the musical motifs in the famous 1960s TV series “Dragnet,” starring Sgt. Joe Friday, played by actor Jack Webb – any relationship to Steve??
For that matter, everything Webb discusses seems to be right on target. His intention is to spread the good news about home ownership, as opposed to rentals. What he says about home equity appears to make sense – as does his spiel about home mortgages being tax deductible, about the advantages of owning a house so that you can decorate it the way you want and play your stereo as loudly as you like. Et cetera, et cetera.
Overall, this is a meticulously produced piece by a witty narrator whose British accent makes the piece all the more resonant and classy. There’s one problem:
Webb’s Home Ownership 101 lecture may have been copacetic a few years ago. Ever since the real estate market crashed, Webb’s comments aren’t so easy to swallow. It’s no longer accurate to say that homeowners will always acquire equity when they purchase a house. I know quite a few people who spent X number of dollars, only to see the value of their houses fall so far that, in terms of their mortgages, the houses are now “underwater.” I’ve heard it said that people who hold onto their houses for at least seven years are bound to end up in the black. But Webb’s blanket optimism about home ownership may be a bit Panglossian.
A few deft emendations might update this piece. Better yet, the housing market might bounce back tomorrow, in which case Sgt. Joe Friday’s dragnet will be foolproof.
I’ve never followed up any review/comment with a postscript. In this case a P.S. is required.
California-based independent producer Marjorie Leet Ford is sitting on a treasure trove. In 1997, along with David Litwin, Leet recorded eight segments that featured Julia Child introducing various authors she admired – everybody knows about Child’s passion for food, but few people are aware that she was also a passionate reader.
Because, as she stated, “I am in LOVE with public radio!” Child volunteered her time and performed resonantly squawky introductions to such writers as Dickens, Willa Cather and John Steinbeck, whose work was read aloud by their authors or by actors like Angela Lansbury and Paul Newman. Naturally, Child focused on these writers’ dealing with food: Dickens describing a feast in “A Christmas Carol,” Willa Cather describing a gluttonous priest in “Death Comes for the Archbishop” and so forth.
If Leet’s “Julia Child and M. F. K. Fisher” is any indication of the quality of the remaining seven segments in the series, there are seven über-lively programs waiting to be released.
The glitch: Marjorie Leet needs funds to finalize her project. Without the infusion of a modicum of support, her stellar series may languish and never hit the airwaves.
I’m certainly not about to hold out my coffee cup and ask for a donation. I think, however, that Leet’s project is significant enough – if there’s a health-care crisis, there’s also a food-care crisis in this country – that I’m calling upon all of you in the public-radio community, to listen to “Julia Child and M. F. K. Fisher,” or if possible consider airing the program, which Leet has offered you free of charge.
With the current hullabaloo over “Julie and Julia,” I guarantee that Leet’s series will appeal to hungry listeners everywhere and achieve the status of an instant radio classic.
Ever since a poem of mine was published alongside an essay – about tea, of all things – by M. F. K. Fisher in “The New Yorker,” I’ve idolized her. Finally, this autumn in the wake of the movie, “Julie and Julia,” the only recording of Mary Frances Kennedy Fisher reading her work has become available. What’s more, the great American chef Julia Child hosts this splendid half-hour. Her full five minutes of introductory remarks, delivered with the resonant squawk Meryl Streep ably mimics in the movie, are as zesty as they are elegant.
It’s trite but true to say that American cuisine has long been dominated by McDonald’s and KFC. Considering this, you will marvel at M. F. K.’s story of a midday meal in France. The year is 1937 when Fisher was 29, but her writing is so impeccable, so vivid with detail, that her piece is timeless. Young Mary Frances is seated alone, off-season, by a stream in a renowned little restaurant called The Old Mill. The wine and food are, predictably, “tres magnifique,” but – and here’s the rub – the solitary waitress is almost demonic in her Gallic devotion to the experience of dining. As Fisher slowly puts away plenty of wine, hors d’oeuvres, trout, salad, dessert and more wine – paying attention to particulars in every delectable sentence – she describes the intimidating waitress to a T.
Fisher’s tone of voice is far more dulcet than Child’s, but this is no formal reading. At one point sitting in what must have been a favorite chair at home, Fisher pauses with an “uh,” and she appears to giggle elsewhere in her reading. Still elsewhere she garbles her diction, but only a bit. Although her writing has the depth and dimension of fiction, she calls it reportage. She’s merely “telling it like it was.”
I’d call this one-of-a-kind performance a national treasure. It should be the duty of every public radio PD to air this piece.
This bracing pick-me-up half-hour production seems perfect during the current economic crisis. Millions of down-and-outers need to be reminded of the power of positive thinking. But Norman Vincent Peale wasn’t the first one to latch onto this notion. In “As You Like It,” Shakespeare’s banished Duke utters the line, “Sweet are the uses of adversity.”
According to Elizabeth Lesser, Co-founder and Senior Advisor with the Omega Institute, the worse things get, the more we need to hang “onto the tiniest shred of hope.” Rather than wallow in anger and despair at being out of work, out of synch with the good times we’ve come to expect here in the wealthiest country on the planet, we need to immerse ourselves in the “river of change.” It’s not necessary to pore over river imagery in the writings of the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus – or quote President Obama – to realize that this moment in time, what one poet called “the still point of the turning world,” will give way to a new moment and perhaps a wholly new scenario.
It’s hard to avoid sounding like a platitudinous Pollyanna, but Lesser manages to stay grounded in her references to Martin Luther King, Jr. and Gandhi, who triumphed over adversity. Although she might have quoted any number of self-help providers, Lesser has a healthy skepticism about gurus. “Be careful about putting people on pedestals,” she says. Her book, “Broken Open,” deals, among other things, with her divorce, a “life quake,” from a husband she may well have put on a pedestal. “All humans are works in progress,” she says, having moved beyond her bad marriage. If this is possible, can we not move beyond Square One – or Square Forty-seven – where we have been unhappily parked for months or years?
A couple of minor quibbles:
1) At one point during the program a woman named Molly from Dayton, Ohio phones to say she lost her job, only to end up with a far better position. I wish there were more local feedback from a piece that’s apparently part interview, part talk show. (I also know how hard it is to elicit phone calls from local listeners.)
2) Because of the way Lesser speaks directly into her mic, her plosives crackle with static. This problem could be corrected electronically.
Full disclosure: the co-hosts of this “Interconnect” segment are two of the most knowledgeable, animated personalities I know on public radio. Over the years when WMUB was part of Miami University I worked with John Hingsbergen and Cheri Lawson. If ever anyone’s voice radiated a smile, it was Lawson’s; I recall her unfailingly chipper voice on morning fundraisers in Oxford, Ohio. As to Hingsbergen, he has the intellectual salt of a Jesuit and the street cred of a comeback kid whose has tasted – and savored – the sweetness of adversity.
Attention, PDs: Hingsbergen and Lawson’s Present Moment Productions is open for business.
You can’t keep Jake Warga down on the farm, which happens to be his home base, Seattle. The last time I caught him he was in Guatemala. Now he’s packed up his camera as well as his mic and has lit out to Norfolk Island. I couldn’t find this island on Google Maps, but it’s supposedly 900 miles off the coast of Australia, a three-by-five-mile rocky outcrop with a good share of evergreens and a local culture you may be glad to hear about.
It’s sad to hear that the local tourist industry, which accounts for most of Norfolk Island’s prosperity, is suffering because of the global economic meltdown. In 2007 40,000 visitors, mostly Aussies, flew to the island to bike, snorkel, and indulge in what must be delectable fish frys. Last year a little more than half as many tourists lived it up at such quaint local hostelries as the Fantasy Island Resort.
What’s grimmer still, the local language is dying out. Warga gives us islander Rhonda Griffith’s rendition of a bit of Norfolk’s endangered lingo, a melodic combo of Tahitian and “very old English” that derives from the original mutineers of the Bounty. “Watawieh yorli?” or “What way are you?” is Norfolkese for “Hello” or “How are you?” Nowadays classes in the island’s indigenous language are required in local schools.
Warga, who’s had good luck licensing his work, is doing Norfolk Island a great service with his four-minute piece. As one of his interviewees says with a thick Down Under accent, Norfolk Island is “a place you shouldn’t miss. It’s one of the places you must go to before you die.”
Warga’s “Economic Storm” is one of the pieces you must treat yourself to before you give up on wanderlust.
Why is it this vox pop piece ends up taking a fairly negative view of neighbors? Underneath Andrew Walsh’s photo of an uninviting wooden barrier between two back yards there’s a caption, “Good fences make good neighbors.” Is Walsh’s skepticism about neighbors a result of his interviewees being from bustling Seattle, rather than from a possibly friendlier, more laid-back city like Omaha?
Despite platitudinous comments from ordinary folk about how a good neighbor is “someone you can count on and who counts on you,“ the lily is gilded with frost. Speaking of “frost,” Robert Frost, in his poem, “Mending Wall,” countered the venerable saying, “Good fences make good neighbors,” with his very own adage, “Something there is that doesn’t love a wall.” In fact, the notion of a “neighborhood” as an enclave of people who know one another’s names and who are available to lend each other a cup of sugar – well, that notion is one of the most comforting myths we cling to.
Because Walsh lets his Emerald City dwellers hold forth without any comments from him, his two-minute voice montage doesn’t go beyond predictable parameters. Perhaps a few sage words from Walsh might have broken through the veneer of such descriptions of a good neighbor as someone who “is not loud, doesn’t have a party at 2 a.m.” Not that this piece should refer to the fall of the Berlin Wall or the disappearance of Mr. Rogers’s neighborhood. But I miss some sort of thoroughly secular, totally street-smart overarching concept here, such as “Love thy neighbor as thyself.”
To listen to a former poet laureate – also a major translator of Dante, a professor at Boston University and a critic who has written for the “New York Times Book Review” – discourse about the Biblical King David could be an über-boring, -pompous experience. On the contrary, Jenny Attiyeh’s 28-minute piece rocks. She not only asks her guest Robert Pinsky the right questions; he answers them with his characteristic rollicking street smarts.
For example, drawing on his new book, “The Life of David,” Pinsky is less interested in David as a pious figure, “the one who is beloved,” which his Hebrew name literally means. Neither is Pinsky’s David a stock figure of the diminutive boy who killed Goliath. Instead, Pinsky views David as a warlord, “a big shot,” even “a thug.” To hear him talk, you might consider a gangster like Meyer Lansky a distant relative of the king who bedded Bathsheba. For that matter, Pinsky sees David’s relationship with Bathsheba as having less to do with love than with lust.
Unlike a theologian or a rabbi, Pinsky is spellbound by stories about David. Insofar as stories derive from imagination, Pinsky talks about the paradoxes and contradictions of a figure as complex as one of our Founding Fathers, say, George Washington – or else King Leopold of Africa who was, for all the good he apparently did, an “appalling man.”
Fundamentalists and diehard knee benders might well object to the description of David as being involved in the “pragmatic ways of a warrior-chieftain.” It is precisely David's – and Pinsky’s – pragmatism, their worldly wisdom, that light up Attiyeh’s interview with multiple laser beams and make her conversation with Pinsky part of a great conversation about David that’s been going on for the past 3000 years.
Yesterday in the veggie aisle of Costco I glimpsed a man’s face. Where had I seen this guy? In an instant I recalled him chatting with my family and me last week at Chicago’s Botanic Gardens. He was the friendly volunteer at the Garden’s elaborate model train setup, a retiree originally from Philadelphia, wearing a locomotive engineer’s black-and-white striped cap.
I’ve always known I was good at recognizing faces. Thanks to this “Moment of Science,” I realize I may be a “super recognizer.” Unlike the 2% of people with propagnozia, who can’t recognize faces at all, I’m at the other end of the spectrum. My ability doesn’t require special smarts. Although this interstitial doesn’t say so, a witness’s ability to remember a face in a lineup is probably a matter of genetics, like being able to curl one’s tongue or learn languages easily.
On the other hand, my memory of Mr. Train Driver was barely a week old. What if I hadn’t seen him since last January? Perhaps I’m wrong to attribute superior skills to my memory of faces.
Anyway, WFIU’s “Moment of Science” series is a new, welcome face to me. If this two-minute module is representative, I’d say that the other dozen-or-so science programs recently uploaded from Indiana University are knowledgeable without being esoteric, newsworthy without being sensational. The level of discourse, if I can call it that, is sophisticated enough to keep a layman listening. Like Thane Maynard’s “90 Second Naturalist” modules from WGUC, these programs may be what public radio needs after years in which certain elected officials turned a relatively blind eye to science. Now may be the time for all good men and women to recognize the face of science like the face of an old friend.
This excellent, all-too-short drop-in deals with the composer whose music first “turned me on” when I was in the eighth grade. It wasn’t so much Beethoven’s Fifth or the majesty of Mozart’s Jupiter Symphony as much as the melodic magic of Edvard Grieg’s “Morning Mood” that struck me dumb. I played all of its three or four minutes so many dozens of times that I feared the grooves of its 12-inch 78 disc would be etched clean by my record changer’s diamond needle.
Listening to Grieg’s “Peer Gynt Suite” or beholding that gorgeous piece of Norwegian wood, “The Last Spring,” still awakens some adolescent core in me, despite my being older than Grieg was when he died 120 years ago this week. The greatness of a composer like Grieg has to do with his schmaltzy tunes that drive straight for a listener’s heart but end up being more than schmaltz. For me, in his A minor piano concerto when he strives to be in a league with Tchaikovsky, he ends up being bombastic, especially in the first movement. Despite the drama of the A minor, it falls short of Schumann’s own A minor piano concerto.
Grieg’s life was, thankfully, not short, brutish and nasty. But neither was it extraordinary. He traveled, married his first cousin and even met Tchaikovsky. He achieved his share of fame and a bit of fortune in his lifetime, unlike another physically diminutive, melodic master, Schubert. But, like Schubert, one could say that Grieg has “lived” more remarkably during the past 100-plus years than he did during his 64 years of life on earth.
I only wish this program were longer than it is. Fred Flaxman has already featured Grieg on several of his celebrated hour-long Compact Discoveries, but to my knowledge Flaxman has not featured a full hour of Grieg for Grieg's sake.
Tobias Wolff is one of my favorite short story writers, perhaps my very favorite. I think of him as an American Chekhov. When he settled into his first big teaching job at Syracuse University with Raymond Carver, I had no trouble referring to them as the Chekhov and de Maupassant of the 1970s.
Carver died more than 20 years ago, and now Wolff remains as a major heavy lifter of short fiction’s torch. He’s a popular writer, though, as he says with a more than a mild touch of sarcasm, he’s aware that he writes for “a vast audience that a short story writer commands, only slightly greater than that of a poet.”
I’m a sucker for Wolff and would whittle out 29 minutes to hear him any day. What a great experience his audience of 500 Kansas City Public Library Show Me Staters must have had listening to him read from his coming-of-age memoir, “Old School.” He recounts his own experience, as a student, of seeing Robert Frost give a poetry reading. In fact, Wolff couldn’t hear a word because he was sitting at the back of the hall.
In contrast, Wolff comes through loud and clear. He talks about how he’d always wanted to be a writer, how imagination defines who we are and “we can only be who we imagine being.” He gives us his memoir’s rendition of himself and his prep school roommate pretending to be Hemingway by speaking as follows: “That is your bed. And it is a good bed. And you must make it. And you must make it well.”
He talks about his anxiety writing and the fun he has rewriting. He says he keeps to a daily writing schedule but tries to be flexible. He has three kids, and “the car needs an oil change now and then, your shoes wear out – you become more liquid in your approach.” He even mentions the shadow of anti-Semitism he was aware of as a prep school student.
Anyone interested in one of America’s most kingly literary lions will enjoy hearing Wolff’s spontaneous remarks, as well as his chiseled, extraordinary prose.
It’s hard to believe that the man who gave this six-minute speech exactly a year ago on August 25, 2008 passed away yesterday on August 25, 2009. Sure, he more than lived up to his words, “I pledge to you that I will be there next January on the floor of the United States Senate when we begin the great test.” Somehow, although we knew his brain cancer would take its course, we expected him to survive for at least another year – perhaps ad infinitum.
His stentorian baritone survives him in podcasts like this, which attests to an oratorical style I identify with the ancient Roman senator Cicero. His politics, which President George Walker Bush used to vilify by identifying it as the “L-word,” survives, along with that of FDR and LBJ, as being in favor of “fair prosperity for the many, and not just for the few”; during our summer of raucous discontent with President Obama’s health care proposals, Senator Kennedy one year ago registered his “new hope that we will break the old gridlock and guarantee that every American – north, south, east, west, young, old – will have decent, quality health care as a fundamental right and not a privilege.”
Most important, his vibrant, flawed, totally human spirit will survive him. Teddy tried with all his heart and soul to serve us, “the many-headed multitude,” whatever our affiliation, whether we believe in the L-word or the C-word. He will continue to serve us as an icon for many years to come.
For starters we might as well listen to some of his famous last words at the Democratic National Convention last summer.
Several middle-aged people I know who thought their jobs were secure are now out of work. If they had listened to this program and followed its advice, I wonder whether they would still be employed.
I doubt it. I wish I could say that Mark Chenoweth’s conversation with the career counselor Debra Wheatman would have made a difference in their careers, now on the rocks. Alas, most of Wheatman’s advice sounds too trite and obvious to be of much use. For example, she advises jobholders, “Keep yourself up to date” with career documents, resumés and project notes, as well as “additional training.”
I’m thinking of one man who, in Oscar Hammerstein’s word, was as up-to-date as Kansas City: he kept plenty of career documents and so forth. He was so assiduous about acquiring additional training that he ended up as an expert in at least three careers. Nevertheless, when the economy cratered last year, his days at his workplace were numbered.
As Wheatman ruefully mentions, “Working. . .is a young man’s game” – oddly, she doesn’t include women in her statement. If this generalization is true, a man – or women – over 50 doesn’t stand much chance of surviving the continual onslaught of younger job seekers. No matter how experienced, ethical and indispensable older workers might appear to be, their more youthful counterparts – be they ever so inexperienced, unethical and disposable – may be hired on the cheap, drawing down salaries that are a fraction of what their elders earn.
If Chenoweth and Wheatman come up with familiar, somewhat platitudinous answers, the question remains: how do older workers keep their jobs and secure a comfortable retirement?
Perhaps a future piece in Chenowerth’s series could address this issue again, less breezily and with more street-smart insights.
Two-thirds of the way through Alan Wolper’s interview of Hal Friedman, the father of Cory, who has Tourette Syndrome, Friedman states that most people nowadays know quite a bit about autism but not a whole lot about TS.
Wolper’s deceptively laid-back questions allow Friedman to talk about how his son excelled at sports, only to be shunned by his teammates. After Little League and football games during which, beset by TS symptoms, Cory was a pivotal player and was hailed as a “hero of the hour,” he was left standing in his high-school parking lot while his comrades went off together to celebrate their victory. The reason for their rudeness: ignorance about Cory’s TS.
A decade ago Jonathan Lethem’s terrific novel “Motherless Brooklyn” featured Lionel Essrog, a detective with TS. Despite his tics, his involuntary grunts and screeches, Essrog solves a murder case. In fact, he believes he’s better at sleuthing because of his obsessive-compulsiveness.
Nonetheless, in 2009 too many TS sufferers are still afflicted with social ostracism doled out by people who don’t know what to make of a disease – or disability – for which there is no known medication. Thanks to Wolper and Papa Friedman’s shining a spotlight, TS may emerge a bit more from the shadows. Moreover, Friedman has collaborated with the megalithic best-selling author James Patterson in “Against Medical Advice,” one of eight books Patterson published in 2008. Because of this book, TS may not become a household name, but it may achieve the recognition factor of a disorder like Asperger’s.
Among the many nuggets of info you will glean from this conversation is the useful acronym, AMA, which stands, not for “American Medical Association,” but for “against medical advice.” In case you’re in a situation where you need to get out of a hospital’s clutches – or need to spring, say, a family member from a hospital – you may want to express your desire to leave and recite the three letters, AMA, a phrase that will legally permit the you and/or the patient to exit the premises.
I’d suggest hanging around Wolper’s premises and, if possible, seeing about licensing his savvy interviews.
Comments by James Reiss
Comment for "Award-winning novel "Netherland" with Joseph O'Neill"
James Reiss
Posted on January 13, 2010 at 05:51 PM | Permalink
No Sticky Wicket
Joseph O’Neill is one of America’s very best novelists under 50 years of age. His super–critically acclaimed third novel, “Netherland,” has been compared to “The Great Gatsby,” mainly because its main character, like Gatsby, meets a watery gangsterish death. What has been less discussed is perhaps the hardest thing to talk about when we talk about fiction, i.e., O’Neill’s masterly writing style, his absolutely awesome technique.
I haven’t the space or the inclination to describe what I mean in detail. Suffice it to say here that Angela Elam’s half-hour interview has enough snippets from “Netherland” for listeners to appreciate the magnificence of O’Neill’s sentences. Without in the least overwriting and filling his pages with purple prose, O’Neill puts together the building blocks of a novel whose sentences have the symphonic aura of Richard Ford’s, the panache of Zadie Smith’s and the subtlety of William Trevor’s.
“Netherland” is about the post–World Trade Center underworld of Third World people who play cricket in New York City. O’Neill is a terrifically artful reader of his own work. Plus, he evinces plenty of street smarts and good old-fashioned charm in his give and take with Elam. I for one had no idea he speaks with a British accent. But forget Churchill and Colonel Blimp: O’Neill is thoroughly a man of our time.
This “New Letters on the Air” interview is thoroughly enlightening, entertaining—just what you’ll want to hear at the outset of our brave new decade!
Comment for "Nonsense At Work: Good riddance 09!"
James Reiss
Posted on December 30, 2009 at 09:48 PM | Permalink
Adios, 2009!
How good to learn that WTIP licensed this piece! No, WTIP is not a big-city station. It’s located on the southern “tip” of Lake Superior. James McIntosh’s ruminations about the year 2009 will be heard by a few thousand people in northern Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and southern Ontario.
On this New Year’s it’s pleasant to think of McIntosh’s piece being pondered by no-nonsense northerners. February is still a good way off, but for millions of us south of Lake Woebegone it’s already, in the words of the Christmas carol, “the bleak mid-winter.” Shall we bless or blame 2009 and, by implication, the aught decade which is fast becoming history?
Whereas most of us have heard George Santayana’s famous quip, “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it,” McIntosh quotes another George—Bernard Shaw: “We learn from history that we learn nothing from history.”
If nothing can be learned from history except the notion that history can teach us nothing, then it follows that we need to light out on our own, fare forward anew as if for the first time and view the present moment with, as one poet put it, “the hottest fire of sight.” As McIntosh puts it, “Experience is hindsight with enough bite to influence the future.”
Bienvenido, 2010!
Comment for "Nonsense At Work: Lazy, your country needs you"
James Reiss
Posted on December 23, 2009 at 06:06 PM | Permalink
A Note Before Christmas
Far be it from me to disagree with the sagacious Robert Karl Skoglund aka the Humble Farmer when he says, “James McIntosh is always worth hearing.”
In his latest interstitial, with his usual perverse humor, McIntosh identifies laziness as the motivating force for change in our free-enterprise rat race—or should I say car show? It was a lazy person, McIntosh contends, who invented power steering. Laziness, he might agree, made room for the World Wide Web and such easy-to-use programs as Google, which have all but done away with arduous searches in sweatshops like the Encyclopedia Britannica.
I’ve been waiting, lazy as a lizard, for McIntosh’s minute-long commentaries to be licensed by a major station like Chicago’s WBEZ. Apparently, the good people responsible for programming at WBEZ—and WNYC—are too busy working hard to savor the benefits of laziness or heed the bard Walt Whitman when he said, “I loaf and invite my soul.”
What a busy bee I’ve been. My comment has already gone on longer than McIntosh’s.
It’s time for a pitcher of eggnog—and a nap.
Comment for "Holy Land Tour"
James Reiss
Posted on December 06, 2009 at 09:53 AM | Permalink
Awake in the Holy Land
More than any travel agent or tour guide, world-traveler Jake Warga is aware of poignant contradictions in various ports of call. In his latest sojourn in the Holy Land, he lets us know that in 2009 Mary and Joseph would not be permitted to enter Bethlehem for Jesus’s birth because both would be Jews unable to cross the checkpoint between Israel and the Occupied Territories. “Jews, “ Warga lets us know, “are not allowed into Bethlehem, the birthplace of the world’s most famous Jew. “
Isaac, we learn from Warga, is the Hebrew word for “He laughs,” and Ishmael for “He weeps.”
As neither a Jew nor a Muslim, Warga uses his mic to record the dead-serious non-laughter of an Israeli woman speaking of Jerusalem’s Colindia checkpoint and, implicitly, of all walls dividing people: “It’s just bad news all around. Can’t put a fence around yourself and have people living in the third world five minutes from your home.”
Warga asks an Arab taxi driver if he speaks Hebrew, and, rather than weeping like his forebear Ishmael, the driver grouses, “No, I don’t speak Jewish.”
These are only a few of this piece’s many rewards. Although we don’t get to see the evidence here, Warga is a superb photographer whose visual images capture the gritty essence of places like Guatemala, Rwanda and Norfolk Island off the coast of Australia.
His script for this piece is an offbeat ear-opener perfect for the winter holiday season—and suitable all year round.
Comment for "Could Solar Power Reenergize Far South Side? by Gabriel Spitzer"
James Reiss
Posted on December 05, 2009 at 09:09 PM | Permalink
Gathering Fuel in Vacant Lots
Lately, the City of the Big Shoulders has had to flex its muscles, along with most every other burg in the United States. West Pullman in south Chicago has been suffering from urban blight long before the Great Recession. Tucked between Midway and Gary, Indiana’s airports, West Pullman is one of those prairie enclaves replete with vacant industrial parks and for-sale signs on foreclosed houses—
except for a pilot project to produce solar panels that could power-up 1200 homes, a project located right next door to beautiful downtown West Pullman.
Gabriel Spitzer’s interview with energy giant Exelon’s Tom O’Neill isn’t terribly artsy. If this report sometimes sounds cut-and-dry, it’s actually not. O’Neill is heading up what could become “the largest urban solar power plant in the nation.” Gazing out over acres of solar panels, he says the panels look “like a series of conference tables that if you were a little taller you could stand up and put your drink on and talk.”
I’d call that a doozy of an image.
Of course, for Exelon’s project to go from West Pullman to homes all over Hog Butcher Land and elsewhere, significant help will have to come from the city of Chicago, as well as from the feds. Well, things are looking good so far. The time seems riper than ever for a solar energy boom—
and, as everyone knows, you don’t have to be a reporter for Chicago Public Radio’s fabled WBEZ to realize that another term for “solar energy boom” is J-O-Bs.
Comment for "Raymond Carver"
James Reiss
Posted on December 03, 2009 at 09:58 PM | Permalink
What We Talk About
This piece has been five-starred by two topnotch authorities in Raymond Carver Land: Carver’s son, Vance Lindsay, as well as Carol Sklenicka, whose new biography, “Raymond Carver: A Writer’s Life,” was today listed among the New York Times Book Review’s ten best books of 2009.
After such stellar endorsements, here are my two cents:
Carver was, as a man and in terms of his writing, a major person for me. His short story, “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love,” is part of the American literary canon. As usual—consider the case of “Julia Child and M. F. K. Fisher”—Leet-Ford and Litwin’s production of this piece is a kind of national treasure.
PDs may want to consider the significance of “love” in this story. If it’s true that, as four Liverpudlians sang, “All you need is love,” this story’s protagonist Mel, a cardiologist, has plenty to say about essential matters of the heart. His tipsy tip sheet abounds with unfoolish inconsistencies in subplots you will chuckle and frown over. The two married couples sitting down for drinks before dinner in Albuquerque discuss what it means to “love one another” in terms no one—certainly not Hemingway—ever brought out of the woodwork. In fact, the four main characters in this story, plus another quartet of characters mentioned “offstage,” are part of a late twentieth-century wallpaper design every American will recognize as part of his or her unique and solitary home.
I don’t agree with the host Herbert Gold’s statement that parental discretion is advised when airing this piece. I think young people need to know more about Shakespeare’s notion that the course of true love never did run smooth. I think people of all ages will want to make space in their day to listen to this piece and give it five stars.
Comment for "Nonsense At Work: Suicides at work"
James Reiss
Posted on November 28, 2009 at 11:05 AM | Permalink
To Be or Not to Be
James McIntosh has always had a dark side. In producing his “Nonsense at Work” series, his comments have ranged from being disgruntled to irreverent. As a curmudgeon he takes pleasure in waking us up to the sometimes nightmarish, sometimes ridiculous activities that fill our workaday lives.
Lately, I’ve worried a bit about him. Perhaps due to the effects of the global recession, he has replaced his publicity photo. Previously, his photo depicted him as an intense guy with a fashionably scruffy beard, in an open-collared white shirt and sports jacket, seated, with his face supported by his right hand, in a position vaguely resembling that of Rodin’s “Thinker.”
Perhaps in synch with the global recession, his new photo shows him in an almost shabby stovepipe hat with a white shirt, bow tie and dark suit jacket. What disturbs me most is his grim facial expression. He looks a bit like W. C. Fields on the skids.
All of which would be innocuous if the subject of McIntosh’s comment under review here weren’t suicide in the workplace. With a huge dollop of black humor, McIntosh asks, “Have you seen any good suicides at work lately?” He then proceeds to contrast Americans, who kill their bosses and coworkers, as opposed to French workers, who kill themselves. Since 2008 24 workers at a particular French business establishment have committed suicide.
I wonder whether suicide occurs as frequently in Japanese places of business, as well as in Scandinavia. Be that as it may, I’m concerned about McIntosh, whose polished British accent hardly hints at the emotional pain he mentions toward the end of this one-minute wakeup call. Thanksgiving, he says, may be a wonderful, life-affirming holiday for people with family and friends. In contrast, “Please spare a thought for those in pain,” he beseeches us.
Well, here’s my penny’s worth of thought for—as the Beatles would say—all the lonely people, possibly including the producer of this piece.
Comment for "Cheryl-Anne Millsap: The poetry of Carl Sandburg"
James Reiss
Posted on November 27, 2009 at 10:57 PM | Permalink
Sandburg Is SpoCAN Here
For years Cheryl-Anne Millsap has been broadcasting from the Inland Northwest. It’s good to see a hefty bunch of her recent pieces for Spokane Public Radio have been uploaded onto PRX—and good to hear her clear voice again.
In this drop-in, her personal essay about her grandfather has the sentimental warmth of a fireside chat. Her piece is titled “The Poetry of Carl Sandburg,” but it’s more a tribute to her bookish grandpa than to the author of “Chicago Poems.” Millsap begins, “My grandfather was a good man,” and she returns to this line as a refrain and her central theme.
It turns out that one of the main reasons Millsap’s granddad was a good man is that he “gave [Millsap] a good start,” i.e., he gave her Sandburg’s “poetry and steel mills and train cars and ordinary people.” It would have been excellent if Millsap had quoted a few lines from one or two of Sandburg’s poems. Failing this, she leaves us to make the connection between poems like “Fog” or “Gone” and her own plainspoken writing style, as well as her own down-home vision of ordinary life.
Who knows what kind of writer Millsap might have become if her grandpa had read poems to her by T. S. Eliot or Wallace Stevens? Let’s leave that question unanswered for now—and enjoy her words from a place that could hardly be called a “hog butcher for the world,” eastern Washington state’s Lilac City!
Comment for "In the Office of Temporary Assistance"
James Reiss
Posted on November 10, 2009 at 11:28 AM | Permalink
Trojan Wars
In the mid-1980s poet Alice Fulton, from Troy, NY, wrote about the vanished glory of her stamping grounds, named for the fabled ancient city near Athens. Today’s Trojan Wars have more to do with battling poverty than doing Homeric deeds of valor on the battlefield. Today’s “Trojan Women” is not a 2600-year-old tragedy by Euripides about widows whose husbands were killed in war. On the contrary, today’s story involves women, often single mothers, who face homelessness and a slavery unknown to the ancient Greeks.
Susan B.A. Somers-Willet’s prose-poem script for this intense radio dialogue relies on a female office worker asking a sequence of standard questions to a 25-year-old mother, Billie Jean Hill, who has lost her job and is seeking financial assistance. Again and again, the office worker, in polished bureaucratic English, repeats the refrain, “Did you know?” while her client mutters an interior monologue of answers in the dialect of the street.
For example, the woman behind the desk asks, “Do you or anyone who lives with you have cash on hand?” To which the client silently answers, “Who would actually tell ‘em that?”
If Somers-Willet’s poem sounds surreal, the scary reality is that every single question in her poem is drawn verbatim from the forms and flyers at the New York State Office of Temporary Assistance. The fact is, we “don’t know” the formulaic questions asked by staff members working to dole out “TA,” temporary assistance. We don’t know what kind of Kafkaesque rigmarole goes on in these offices, and we need to know these things.
This stellar piece was done as a multimedia event involving photographs as well as interviews and poetry in connection with one of America’s topnotch literary magazines, The Virginia Quarterly Review.
So far this piece has been licensed by three radio stations. It deserves to be licensed by at least thirty stations.
Comment for "The Arugula Wars: Food as partisan politics"
James Reiss
Posted on November 08, 2009 at 12:21 PM | Permalink
Food Wars
What could be better for November 26th than Guy Hand’s six-minute discourse on what we love most about Thanksgiving, food?
Idaho good-old-boy Guy Hand doesn’t say much about Idaho mashed potatoes and turkey. He has a mouthful of things to say about the pungent Mediterranean lettuce known as arugula. Even if his tongue twists around the word so that he continually mispronounces it while some of his interviewees pronounce it correctly, he knows what he’s talking about. No red-meat-eating, pickup-truck-driving, barn-owl-loving Gem Stater would trade his store-bought plastic-wrapped iceberg lettuce for a fancy-schmancy bitter Italian plant whose name he can’t pronounce. For that matter, Hand mispronounces the word “restaurateur”!
In the Pacific Northwest you can get away with pronouncing Rush Limbaugh as “God.” Which makes Hand’s piece funnier than a barrel of Sarah Palins scarfing brie and chablis at the Poetry Society of Boise. Hand handily edits his ruminations — chewing his cud — into a tasty concoction that may be closer to a blue-plate special than a foodies’ feast. But there’s enough here to please both Volvo-driving, Trader-Joe’s-going, garbanzo-bean-munching vegans and Wal-Mart-loving, Jim-Beam-swilling, Glock-pistol-packing carnivores.
Bon appetit!
Comment for "Concorde"
James Reiss
Posted on November 04, 2009 at 11:50 AM | Permalink
An Oldie
This piece is more than a bit long in the tooth. Producer William Hammack describes the Concorde as “soon to stop flying.” He uses the present tense to say that the Concorde “flies higher and faster than any other commercial jet.”
Unless my memory disappeared off the radar screen, the Concorde stopped flying in 2003. Hammack apparently dusted off this drop-in and uploaded it onto PRX without the P.S. that its subject is nearly seven years out of date.
Still, Hammack is right on target when he says that today “with cell phones, cheap long distance service, and express mail, there are many times where a person can just stay put, instead of hop a continent.”
I’ve noticed that Hammack is an enormously prolific producer. He’s uploaded dozens of pieces onto PRX.
This is one of them that should have stayed put in an archive. Without at least a footnote, it doesn’t fly.
Comment for "United States Poet Laureate Kay Ryan"
James Reiss
Posted on October 22, 2009 at 06:00 PM | Permalink
You Have to Love Her
Although our current U.S. Poet Laureate Kay Ryan’s work is chiseled and granite-like – far from “confessional” or sentimental – this interview abounds with heartfelt personal details.
Ryan talks about how, while she was biking across the country in 1976, she heard a disembodied voice answer her silent question about becoming a poet with “Do you like it?” She talks about her father, a dreamer, who died prematurely while he was away from home, reading a get-rich-quick book at a motel. Most poignantly, she talks about how her “life partner” Carol died earlier this year, happy about Ryan’s accepting the poet laureateship partly because it offset the horror of her own death by cancer.
Then, too, Ryan muses about the ups and downs of her career, which was slow to take off; this will give hope to many aspiring poets listening to her success story. Her first book, supported by a group of Carol’s friends who got together and anteed up funds, was self-published. Ryan was no less than 50 years old when her first poem was published in “The New Yorker.” She was lying in bed reading the papers one Sunday morning when Carol pointed out one of Ryan’s poems quoted in “Boondocks” in the funnies – at which point Ryan felt as though she’d really “arrived” as a writer.
Everything that I’ve read by Ryan that has struck me as flinty and cold on the page gives way in this terrific interview from the long-standing topnotch Kansas City series, “New Letters on the Air.” Ryan ends up sounding like my image of Emily Dickinson on a fine Amherst morning.
She’s as warm as toast.
Comment for "Navigate the mortgage process"
James Reiss
Posted on October 18, 2009 at 11:43 AM | Permalink
Sea Surface Full of Clouds
Voyage with Steve Webb on the murky if fairly well charted waters of Mortgage Zee (to borrow the Dutch term). The less you know about sailing, the more you’ll learn from Webb’s guide for seafarers. As usual with Webb’s audio segments from the Real Estate Today series, this one is as lively as a pirate, with an Irish-sounding mariner’s tune as background music, plus the lilt of Webb’s crisp British accent to keep us awake.
Once again, as in his piece about renting versus buying a house, there’s a sort of disconnect between the current economic doldrums and the brisk wind in Webb’s sails — or sales talk. It’s all fitting and proper that we know about the p’s and q’s of credit ratings when applying for a mortgage. My guess, however, is that most public-radio listeners are already familiar with this material. Much as I admire Webb’s blithe spirit, I wonder about the ultimate value of his Coldwell Banker approach, given the complexities of the real estate scene in 2009.
Dry land can be fraught with bumpy roads, after all. But the pitfalls of terra firma don’t appear to interest Cap’n Webb. Toward the end of this piece his Irish-sounding background music segues to “Anchors Aweigh,” leaving us happily if a bit queasily at sea.
Comment for "A HALLOWEEN INVASION FROM MARS"
James Reiss
Posted on October 16, 2009 at 11:17 AM | Permalink
The Martians Are Coming
What could be more spine tingling for Halloween than a rebroadcast of Orson Welles’s famous radio play, “The Invasion from Mars”? Most Americans know the grisly story of its initial airing on October 30, 1938. Although Welles prefaced his production with a statement that “The Invasion” was a play, at least a million listeners were so persuaded by the power of his drama that they thought Martians were indeed invading the Earth. As a result, the Golden Age of Radio turned into One Huge Dollop of Panic, One Chaotic Evening of More than Trick or Treating.
I for one have never heard “The Invasion from Mars,” and I’d welcome bending an ear to it on Halloween eve. If it were aired, Dick Meister’s introduction would be must-hear material. Even though more than 71 years have elapsed, making the audio quality of Welles’s premiere sound a bit antique, I’d bet that, without Meister’s sage and salty introduction, thousands of people listening to “The Invasion” would go berserk in 2009 just as they did prior to World War Two. After all, we are still involved in at least one war that spans a great deal of the world. We are still as gullible as ever.
I only wish Meister’s elocution were crisper and clearer. He’s a terrific journalist but not expert at reading his script aloud in front of a mic.
Small potatoes when you consider the giant jack-o’-lantern “The Invasion” would be if it were rebroadcast on Saturday night October 31, 2009.
I vote for Dick Meister as MC of the evening.
Comment for "The Piano Psychologist"
James Reiss
Posted on October 12, 2009 at 05:24 PM | Permalink
Pythagoras and the Stars
Once again I’ve “clicked” with John Tynan. The other day I responded fully to a monologue he uploaded onto PRX about his shaved head. Today I’m marveling at his homage to the creative spirit. My poem, “The Piano Tuner,” in a recent issue of “The Atlantic Monthly,” harmonizes with what Tynan says about his piano tuner, Kevin Jenkins. (Is this weird synchronicity or what?)
Jenkins calls himself a “piano psychologist” who listens to people’s stories like a “shrink” at least as intently as he does to their pianos. Many of Jenkins’s clients regret having sold or given away their pianos. They’ve lost something of great value in their lives.
At this point in his energetic, easygoing way Tynan talks about how he used to enjoy playing piano at his grandmother’s house in Tucson; how his improvising at the keyboard was a peak experience; how it’s not necessary to take lessons and learn to be a concert pianist for us to experiment and have fun at the keyboard. In our striving to master the art of this and that, Tynan suggests that we’ve lost something extremely valuable, that is, the ability to enjoy music innocently and to trust our own musical instincts.
“People really can play the piano, regardless of their abilities. They should enjoy playing the piano,” he says finally while a beautiful bare-bones melody — half-Satie, half-Fauré? — begins to take over in the background. But this is not Satie, not Fauré. The music is being improvised by Tynan, or perhaps Jenkins, who, unselfconscious about whether he’s a “great” musician or not, is in perfect tune with — to quote my poem — Pythagoras and the stars.
Comment for "Bald"
James Reiss
Posted on October 11, 2009 at 11:58 AM | Permalink
The Rape of the Locks
First there was Yul Brynner. Then there was Michael Jordan. Now there’s John Tynan.
I go along with the notion that bald is beautiful because, I, too, went into the bathroom one Sunday afternoon — like John Tynan — and shaved my head. It’s been a few years, and neither my wife nor I have any regrets about my follicular decision.
But enough about me! Tynan’s lilting, half-lugubrious, half-joyous description of the day he decided to trim his locks is a kind of tone poem. Sure, he had trouble cutting and shaving the back of his head viewed through a mirror. Sure, he had fantasies of ramming a cap over his botched tonsure job and sneaking over to a barbershop to have his hair-mowing finished so he didn’t look like a half-hairy ape. Sure, he suffered the anxiety of anybody about to make a clean cut with the past and begin anew with vigor and a shiny pate.But he seems to have loved the process, and the smile on his face in the photo accompanying his PRX piece attests to this.
Two teensy problems — and maybe I missed something vis-à-vis the first: Tynan makes much ado about using a safety razor and a pair of scissors. The sound track, however, is abuzz with an electric razor. This tiny ingrown hair, as it were, doesn’t prevent the sound track from being as playful and inventive as anything you’d want to hear, given the subject.
My second quibble has to do with the piece’s being a couple of minutes too long. After four minutes Tynan’s shtick begins to sound as though it, like Tynan’s hair mop, could be cut.
Despite the “South Pacific” song, “I’m Gonna Wash That Man Right Outta My Hair,” there’s nothing quite like “Bald”! It’d be perfect to air during National Shearling Month!
Comment for "ABREN UNIVERSIDAD"
James Reiss
Posted on October 08, 2009 at 09:28 PM | Permalink
Buenas Notícias
¡Qué buenas notícias para la nación conocida, desafortunadamente, en el modismo, “Salir de Guatemala y meterse en guatepeor”! En el pequeño país sur de México, en el Quiché, va a abrir el centro universitario el enero que viene, y van a haber 400 estudiantes peleando contra la ignorancia y la pobreza.
Aunque este programa sea no más conferencia de prensa, significa muchísimo. Ya que el crimen haya contribuido a una vida peligrosa tanto en las ciudades como en el campo Guatemalteco, las palabras de los dos educadores Lisandro Antillon y Edgar Vinicio Marroquin Rosas me dan más que un poquito de esperanza.
Por eso les digo a los maestros y a los alumnus, con todo el corazon, “¡Buena suerte al centro universitario de Quiché, Guatemala!”
Comment for "To Buy or Rent"
James Reiss
Posted on October 03, 2009 at 11:54 AM | Permalink
Dragging the Net
There’s plenty to admire in Steve Webb’s monologue about real estate. First of all, it’s not merely a monologue. Webb expertly intersperses his remarks with amusing sound effects. At the outset, for example, he uses crashing musical chords to emphasize his being a member of “Rentaholics Anonymous,” and the result resembles something like the musical motifs in the famous 1960s TV series “Dragnet,” starring Sgt. Joe Friday, played by actor Jack Webb – any relationship to Steve??
For that matter, everything Webb discusses seems to be right on target. His intention is to spread the good news about home ownership, as opposed to rentals. What he says about home equity appears to make sense – as does his spiel about home mortgages being tax deductible, about the advantages of owning a house so that you can decorate it the way you want and play your stereo as loudly as you like. Et cetera, et cetera.
Overall, this is a meticulously produced piece by a witty narrator whose British accent makes the piece all the more resonant and classy. There’s one problem:
Webb’s Home Ownership 101 lecture may have been copacetic a few years ago. Ever since the real estate market crashed, Webb’s comments aren’t so easy to swallow. It’s no longer accurate to say that homeowners will always acquire equity when they purchase a house. I know quite a few people who spent X number of dollars, only to see the value of their houses fall so far that, in terms of their mortgages, the houses are now “underwater.” I’ve heard it said that people who hold onto their houses for at least seven years are bound to end up in the black. But Webb’s blanket optimism about home ownership may be a bit Panglossian.
A few deft emendations might update this piece. Better yet, the housing market might bounce back tomorrow, in which case Sgt. Joe Friday’s dragnet will be foolproof.
Comment for "Julia Child and M.F.K. Fisher"
James Reiss
Posted on September 25, 2009 at 01:08 PM | Permalink
A National Treasure, Part Two
I’ve never followed up any review/comment with a postscript. In this case a P.S. is required.
California-based independent producer Marjorie Leet Ford is sitting on a treasure trove. In 1997, along with David Litwin, Leet recorded eight segments that featured Julia Child introducing various authors she admired – everybody knows about Child’s passion for food, but few people are aware that she was also a passionate reader.
Because, as she stated, “I am in LOVE with public radio!” Child volunteered her time and performed resonantly squawky introductions to such writers as Dickens, Willa Cather and John Steinbeck, whose work was read aloud by their authors or by actors like Angela Lansbury and Paul Newman. Naturally, Child focused on these writers’ dealing with food: Dickens describing a feast in “A Christmas Carol,” Willa Cather describing a gluttonous priest in “Death Comes for the Archbishop” and so forth.
If Leet’s “Julia Child and M. F. K. Fisher” is any indication of the quality of the remaining seven segments in the series, there are seven über-lively programs waiting to be released.
The glitch: Marjorie Leet needs funds to finalize her project. Without the infusion of a modicum of support, her stellar series may languish and never hit the airwaves.
I’m certainly not about to hold out my coffee cup and ask for a donation. I think, however, that Leet’s project is significant enough – if there’s a health-care crisis, there’s also a food-care crisis in this country – that I’m calling upon all of you in the public-radio community, to listen to “Julia Child and M. F. K. Fisher,” or if possible consider airing the program, which Leet has offered you free of charge.
With the current hullabaloo over “Julie and Julia,” I guarantee that Leet’s series will appeal to hungry listeners everywhere and achieve the status of an instant radio classic.
Comment for "Julia Child and M.F.K. Fisher"
James Reiss
Posted on September 23, 2009 at 09:26 PM | Permalink
A National Treasure
Ever since a poem of mine was published alongside an essay – about tea, of all things – by M. F. K. Fisher in “The New Yorker,” I’ve idolized her. Finally, this autumn in the wake of the movie, “Julie and Julia,” the only recording of Mary Frances Kennedy Fisher reading her work has become available. What’s more, the great American chef Julia Child hosts this splendid half-hour. Her full five minutes of introductory remarks, delivered with the resonant squawk Meryl Streep ably mimics in the movie, are as zesty as they are elegant.
It’s trite but true to say that American cuisine has long been dominated by McDonald’s and KFC. Considering this, you will marvel at M. F. K.’s story of a midday meal in France. The year is 1937 when Fisher was 29, but her writing is so impeccable, so vivid with detail, that her piece is timeless. Young Mary Frances is seated alone, off-season, by a stream in a renowned little restaurant called The Old Mill. The wine and food are, predictably, “tres magnifique,” but – and here’s the rub – the solitary waitress is almost demonic in her Gallic devotion to the experience of dining. As Fisher slowly puts away plenty of wine, hors d’oeuvres, trout, salad, dessert and more wine – paying attention to particulars in every delectable sentence – she describes the intimidating waitress to a T.
Fisher’s tone of voice is far more dulcet than Child’s, but this is no formal reading. At one point sitting in what must have been a favorite chair at home, Fisher pauses with an “uh,” and she appears to giggle elsewhere in her reading. Still elsewhere she garbles her diction, but only a bit. Although her writing has the depth and dimension of fiction, she calls it reportage. She’s merely “telling it like it was.”
I’d call this one-of-a-kind performance a national treasure. It should be the duty of every public radio PD to air this piece.
Comment for "Interconnect: How Difficult Times Can Help Us Grow"
James Reiss
Posted on September 21, 2009 at 11:46 AM | Permalink
Only Connect!
This bracing pick-me-up half-hour production seems perfect during the current economic crisis. Millions of down-and-outers need to be reminded of the power of positive thinking. But Norman Vincent Peale wasn’t the first one to latch onto this notion. In “As You Like It,” Shakespeare’s banished Duke utters the line, “Sweet are the uses of adversity.”
According to Elizabeth Lesser, Co-founder and Senior Advisor with the Omega Institute, the worse things get, the more we need to hang “onto the tiniest shred of hope.” Rather than wallow in anger and despair at being out of work, out of synch with the good times we’ve come to expect here in the wealthiest country on the planet, we need to immerse ourselves in the “river of change.” It’s not necessary to pore over river imagery in the writings of the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus – or quote President Obama – to realize that this moment in time, what one poet called “the still point of the turning world,” will give way to a new moment and perhaps a wholly new scenario.
It’s hard to avoid sounding like a platitudinous Pollyanna, but Lesser manages to stay grounded in her references to Martin Luther King, Jr. and Gandhi, who triumphed over adversity. Although she might have quoted any number of self-help providers, Lesser has a healthy skepticism about gurus. “Be careful about putting people on pedestals,” she says. Her book, “Broken Open,” deals, among other things, with her divorce, a “life quake,” from a husband she may well have put on a pedestal. “All humans are works in progress,” she says, having moved beyond her bad marriage. If this is possible, can we not move beyond Square One – or Square Forty-seven – where we have been unhappily parked for months or years?
A couple of minor quibbles:
1) At one point during the program a woman named Molly from Dayton, Ohio phones to say she lost her job, only to end up with a far better position. I wish there were more local feedback from a piece that’s apparently part interview, part talk show. (I also know how hard it is to elicit phone calls from local listeners.)
2) Because of the way Lesser speaks directly into her mic, her plosives crackle with static. This problem could be corrected electronically.
Full disclosure: the co-hosts of this “Interconnect” segment are two of the most knowledgeable, animated personalities I know on public radio. Over the years when WMUB was part of Miami University I worked with John Hingsbergen and Cheri Lawson. If ever anyone’s voice radiated a smile, it was Lawson’s; I recall her unfailingly chipper voice on morning fundraisers in Oxford, Ohio. As to Hingsbergen, he has the intellectual salt of a Jesuit and the street cred of a comeback kid whose has tasted – and savored – the sweetness of adversity.
Attention, PDs: Hingsbergen and Lawson’s Present Moment Productions is open for business.
Comment for "Economic Storm Hits Norfolk Island"
James Reiss
Posted on September 19, 2009 at 06:15 PM | Permalink
Jake Warga's War on Boredom
You can’t keep Jake Warga down on the farm, which happens to be his home base, Seattle. The last time I caught him he was in Guatemala. Now he’s packed up his camera as well as his mic and has lit out to Norfolk Island. I couldn’t find this island on Google Maps, but it’s supposedly 900 miles off the coast of Australia, a three-by-five-mile rocky outcrop with a good share of evergreens and a local culture you may be glad to hear about.
It’s sad to hear that the local tourist industry, which accounts for most of Norfolk Island’s prosperity, is suffering because of the global economic meltdown. In 2007 40,000 visitors, mostly Aussies, flew to the island to bike, snorkel, and indulge in what must be delectable fish frys. Last year a little more than half as many tourists lived it up at such quaint local hostelries as the Fantasy Island Resort.
What’s grimmer still, the local language is dying out. Warga gives us islander Rhonda Griffith’s rendition of a bit of Norfolk’s endangered lingo, a melodic combo of Tahitian and “very old English” that derives from the original mutineers of the Bounty. “Watawieh yorli?” or “What way are you?” is Norfolkese for “Hello” or “How are you?” Nowadays classes in the island’s indigenous language are required in local schools.
Warga, who’s had good luck licensing his work, is doing Norfolk Island a great service with his four-minute piece. As one of his interviewees says with a thick Down Under accent, Norfolk Island is “a place you shouldn’t miss. It’s one of the places you must go to before you die.”
Warga’s “Economic Storm” is one of the pieces you must treat yourself to before you give up on wanderlust.
Comment for "Neighbors"
James Reiss
Posted on September 13, 2009 at 11:18 AM | Permalink
Love Thy Neighbor?
Why is it this vox pop piece ends up taking a fairly negative view of neighbors? Underneath Andrew Walsh’s photo of an uninviting wooden barrier between two back yards there’s a caption, “Good fences make good neighbors.” Is Walsh’s skepticism about neighbors a result of his interviewees being from bustling Seattle, rather than from a possibly friendlier, more laid-back city like Omaha?
Despite platitudinous comments from ordinary folk about how a good neighbor is “someone you can count on and who counts on you,“ the lily is gilded with frost. Speaking of “frost,” Robert Frost, in his poem, “Mending Wall,” countered the venerable saying, “Good fences make good neighbors,” with his very own adage, “Something there is that doesn’t love a wall.” In fact, the notion of a “neighborhood” as an enclave of people who know one another’s names and who are available to lend each other a cup of sugar – well, that notion is one of the most comforting myths we cling to.
Because Walsh lets his Emerald City dwellers hold forth without any comments from him, his two-minute voice montage doesn’t go beyond predictable parameters. Perhaps a few sage words from Walsh might have broken through the veneer of such descriptions of a good neighbor as someone who “is not loud, doesn’t have a party at 2 a.m.” Not that this piece should refer to the fall of the Berlin Wall or the disappearance of Mr. Rogers’s neighborhood. But I miss some sort of thoroughly secular, totally street-smart overarching concept here, such as “Love thy neighbor as thyself.”
Comment for "Poet Robert Pinsky takes on another poet, King David of the Bible - and of the Psalms - in his "Life of David.""
James Reiss
Posted on September 06, 2009 at 06:05 PM | Permalink
A Great Conversation
To listen to a former poet laureate – also a major translator of Dante, a professor at Boston University and a critic who has written for the “New York Times Book Review” – discourse about the Biblical King David could be an über-boring, -pompous experience. On the contrary, Jenny Attiyeh’s 28-minute piece rocks. She not only asks her guest Robert Pinsky the right questions; he answers them with his characteristic rollicking street smarts.
For example, drawing on his new book, “The Life of David,” Pinsky is less interested in David as a pious figure, “the one who is beloved,” which his Hebrew name literally means. Neither is Pinsky’s David a stock figure of the diminutive boy who killed Goliath. Instead, Pinsky views David as a warlord, “a big shot,” even “a thug.” To hear him talk, you might consider a gangster like Meyer Lansky a distant relative of the king who bedded Bathsheba. For that matter, Pinsky sees David’s relationship with Bathsheba as having less to do with love than with lust.
Unlike a theologian or a rabbi, Pinsky is spellbound by stories about David. Insofar as stories derive from imagination, Pinsky talks about the paradoxes and contradictions of a figure as complex as one of our Founding Fathers, say, George Washington – or else King Leopold of Africa who was, for all the good he apparently did, an “appalling man.”
Fundamentalists and diehard knee benders might well object to the description of David as being involved in the “pragmatic ways of a warrior-chieftain.” It is precisely David's – and Pinsky’s – pragmatism, their worldly wisdom, that light up Attiyeh’s interview with multiple laser beams and make her conversation with Pinsky part of a great conversation about David that’s been going on for the past 3000 years.
Comment for "Remembering Faces Forever"
James Reiss
Posted on September 03, 2009 at 10:37 AM | Permalink
Face It, Friends
Yesterday in the veggie aisle of Costco I glimpsed a man’s face. Where had I seen this guy? In an instant I recalled him chatting with my family and me last week at Chicago’s Botanic Gardens. He was the friendly volunteer at the Garden’s elaborate model train setup, a retiree originally from Philadelphia, wearing a locomotive engineer’s black-and-white striped cap.
I’ve always known I was good at recognizing faces. Thanks to this “Moment of Science,” I realize I may be a “super recognizer.” Unlike the 2% of people with propagnozia, who can’t recognize faces at all, I’m at the other end of the spectrum. My ability doesn’t require special smarts. Although this interstitial doesn’t say so, a witness’s ability to remember a face in a lineup is probably a matter of genetics, like being able to curl one’s tongue or learn languages easily.
On the other hand, my memory of Mr. Train Driver was barely a week old. What if I hadn’t seen him since last January? Perhaps I’m wrong to attribute superior skills to my memory of faces.
Anyway, WFIU’s “Moment of Science” series is a new, welcome face to me. If this two-minute module is representative, I’d say that the other dozen-or-so science programs recently uploaded from Indiana University are knowledgeable without being esoteric, newsworthy without being sensational. The level of discourse, if I can call it that, is sophisticated enough to keep a layman listening. Like Thane Maynard’s “90 Second Naturalist” modules from WGUC, these programs may be what public radio needs after years in which certain elected officials turned a relatively blind eye to science. Now may be the time for all good men and women to recognize the face of science like the face of an old friend.
Comment for "Edvard Grieg - died on September 4, 1907"
James Reiss
Posted on August 31, 2009 at 06:25 PM | Permalink
The Little Giant
This excellent, all-too-short drop-in deals with the composer whose music first “turned me on” when I was in the eighth grade. It wasn’t so much Beethoven’s Fifth or the majesty of Mozart’s Jupiter Symphony as much as the melodic magic of Edvard Grieg’s “Morning Mood” that struck me dumb. I played all of its three or four minutes so many dozens of times that I feared the grooves of its 12-inch 78 disc would be etched clean by my record changer’s diamond needle.
Listening to Grieg’s “Peer Gynt Suite” or beholding that gorgeous piece of Norwegian wood, “The Last Spring,” still awakens some adolescent core in me, despite my being older than Grieg was when he died 120 years ago this week. The greatness of a composer like Grieg has to do with his schmaltzy tunes that drive straight for a listener’s heart but end up being more than schmaltz. For me, in his A minor piano concerto when he strives to be in a league with Tchaikovsky, he ends up being bombastic, especially in the first movement. Despite the drama of the A minor, it falls short of Schumann’s own A minor piano concerto.
Grieg’s life was, thankfully, not short, brutish and nasty. But neither was it extraordinary. He traveled, married his first cousin and even met Tchaikovsky. He achieved his share of fame and a bit of fortune in his lifetime, unlike another physically diminutive, melodic master, Schubert. But, like Schubert, one could say that Grieg has “lived” more remarkably during the past 100-plus years than he did during his 64 years of life on earth.
I only wish this program were longer than it is. Fred Flaxman has already featured Grieg on several of his celebrated hour-long Compact Discoveries, but to my knowledge Flaxman has not featured a full hour of Grieg for Grieg's sake.
I wish he would.
Comment for "Memoirist and Fiction Writer Tobias Wolff"
James Reiss
Posted on August 27, 2009 at 05:45 PM | Permalink
Wolff Is a Lion
Tobias Wolff is one of my favorite short story writers, perhaps my very favorite. I think of him as an American Chekhov. When he settled into his first big teaching job at Syracuse University with Raymond Carver, I had no trouble referring to them as the Chekhov and de Maupassant of the 1970s.
Carver died more than 20 years ago, and now Wolff remains as a major heavy lifter of short fiction’s torch. He’s a popular writer, though, as he says with a more than a mild touch of sarcasm, he’s aware that he writes for “a vast audience that a short story writer commands, only slightly greater than that of a poet.”
I’m a sucker for Wolff and would whittle out 29 minutes to hear him any day. What a great experience his audience of 500 Kansas City Public Library Show Me Staters must have had listening to him read from his coming-of-age memoir, “Old School.” He recounts his own experience, as a student, of seeing Robert Frost give a poetry reading. In fact, Wolff couldn’t hear a word because he was sitting at the back of the hall.
In contrast, Wolff comes through loud and clear. He talks about how he’d always wanted to be a writer, how imagination defines who we are and “we can only be who we imagine being.” He gives us his memoir’s rendition of himself and his prep school roommate pretending to be Hemingway by speaking as follows: “That is your bed. And it is a good bed. And you must make it. And you must make it well.”
He talks about his anxiety writing and the fun he has rewriting. He says he keeps to a daily writing schedule but tries to be flexible. He has three kids, and “the car needs an oil change now and then, your shoes wear out – you become more liquid in your approach.” He even mentions the shadow of anti-Semitism he was aware of as a prep school student.
Anyone interested in one of America’s most kingly literary lions will enjoy hearing Wolff’s spontaneous remarks, as well as his chiseled, extraordinary prose.
Comment for "DNC08: U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy"
James Reiss
Posted on August 26, 2009 at 06:12 PM | Permalink
Teddy
It’s hard to believe that the man who gave this six-minute speech exactly a year ago on August 25, 2008 passed away yesterday on August 25, 2009. Sure, he more than lived up to his words, “I pledge to you that I will be there next January on the floor of the United States Senate when we begin the great test.” Somehow, although we knew his brain cancer would take its course, we expected him to survive for at least another year – perhaps ad infinitum.
His stentorian baritone survives him in podcasts like this, which attests to an oratorical style I identify with the ancient Roman senator Cicero. His politics, which President George Walker Bush used to vilify by identifying it as the “L-word,” survives, along with that of FDR and LBJ, as being in favor of “fair prosperity for the many, and not just for the few”; during our summer of raucous discontent with President Obama’s health care proposals, Senator Kennedy one year ago registered his “new hope that we will break the old gridlock and guarantee that every American – north, south, east, west, young, old – will have decent, quality health care as a fundamental right and not a privilege.”
Most important, his vibrant, flawed, totally human spirit will survive him. Teddy tried with all his heart and soul to serve us, “the many-headed multitude,” whatever our affiliation, whether we believe in the L-word or the C-word. He will continue to serve us as an icon for many years to come.
For starters we might as well listen to some of his famous last words at the Democratic National Convention last summer.
Comment for "Staying Employed... Over 50 Attitude and Appreciation"
James Reiss
Posted on August 15, 2009 at 05:50 PM | Permalink
Keeping Your Job
Several middle-aged people I know who thought their jobs were secure are now out of work. If they had listened to this program and followed its advice, I wonder whether they would still be employed.
I doubt it. I wish I could say that Mark Chenoweth’s conversation with the career counselor Debra Wheatman would have made a difference in their careers, now on the rocks. Alas, most of Wheatman’s advice sounds too trite and obvious to be of much use. For example, she advises jobholders, “Keep yourself up to date” with career documents, resumés and project notes, as well as “additional training.”
I’m thinking of one man who, in Oscar Hammerstein’s word, was as up-to-date as Kansas City: he kept plenty of career documents and so forth. He was so assiduous about acquiring additional training that he ended up as an expert in at least three careers. Nevertheless, when the economy cratered last year, his days at his workplace were numbered.
As Wheatman ruefully mentions, “Working. . .is a young man’s game” – oddly, she doesn’t include women in her statement. If this generalization is true, a man – or women – over 50 doesn’t stand much chance of surviving the continual onslaught of younger job seekers. No matter how experienced, ethical and indispensable older workers might appear to be, their more youthful counterparts – be they ever so inexperienced, unethical and disposable – may be hired on the cheap, drawing down salaries that are a fraction of what their elders earn.
If Chenoweth and Wheatman come up with familiar, somewhat platitudinous answers, the question remains: how do older workers keep their jobs and secure a comfortable retirement?
Perhaps a future piece in Chenowerth’s series could address this issue again, less breezily and with more street-smart insights.
Comment for "Hal Friedman, a New York advertising executive co-authors book with James Patterson"
James Reiss
Posted on August 14, 2009 at 12:30 PM | Permalink
Shining the Spotlight
Two-thirds of the way through Alan Wolper’s interview of Hal Friedman, the father of Cory, who has Tourette Syndrome, Friedman states that most people nowadays know quite a bit about autism but not a whole lot about TS.
Wolper’s deceptively laid-back questions allow Friedman to talk about how his son excelled at sports, only to be shunned by his teammates. After Little League and football games during which, beset by TS symptoms, Cory was a pivotal player and was hailed as a “hero of the hour,” he was left standing in his high-school parking lot while his comrades went off together to celebrate their victory. The reason for their rudeness: ignorance about Cory’s TS.
A decade ago Jonathan Lethem’s terrific novel “Motherless Brooklyn” featured Lionel Essrog, a detective with TS. Despite his tics, his involuntary grunts and screeches, Essrog solves a murder case. In fact, he believes he’s better at sleuthing because of his obsessive-compulsiveness.
Nonetheless, in 2009 too many TS sufferers are still afflicted with social ostracism doled out by people who don’t know what to make of a disease – or disability – for which there is no known medication. Thanks to Wolper and Papa Friedman’s shining a spotlight, TS may emerge a bit more from the shadows. Moreover, Friedman has collaborated with the megalithic best-selling author James Patterson in “Against Medical Advice,” one of eight books Patterson published in 2008. Because of this book, TS may not become a household name, but it may achieve the recognition factor of a disorder like Asperger’s.
Among the many nuggets of info you will glean from this conversation is the useful acronym, AMA, which stands, not for “American Medical Association,” but for “against medical advice.” In case you’re in a situation where you need to get out of a hospital’s clutches – or need to spring, say, a family member from a hospital – you may want to express your desire to leave and recite the three letters, AMA, a phrase that will legally permit the you and/or the patient to exit the premises.
I’d suggest hanging around Wolper’s premises and, if possible, seeing about licensing his savvy interviews.