
From: Peter Crimmins
Length: 00:05:33
In 2003 the San Francisco Public Library experienced an explosion of vandalism. A lone man with a sharp knife methodically used the card catalog to target the library's gay and lesbian collection. After 600 books were slashed the perpetrator was caught, but the library could not re-shelved the damaged books. So librarian Jim van Buskirk had the idea to give books to artists and see what they would do to them. The result was an exhibit of sculpted and re-structured books, called "Reversing Vandalism". It was meant to erase the hate crime carved onto these books. This radio piece describes how you have to take the destruction a lot further before you can rescue it from hate.
|
Review of How To Destroy A BookVandalism reveals a lot about a community as a man attempts to systematically destroy the San Francisco Public Library's (SFPL) lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender books. One immediately contemplates the virulent nature of the attack, and how disturbing it is to attempt to destroy a group's entire literary and cultural record. Jim Van Buskirk, SFPL's program manager, recalls that the incident was "pretty nerve-racking" because he felt it was not "that big a leap from carving up books to carving up people." Perhaps the most human part of the piece describes a book whose inscription on the title page ("To Richard with good warm wishes from Robert") was slashed through by the vandal. What once represented hatred and intolerance became a site of joy and community outpouring as artists and San Francisco residents turned their loss into an artistic exhibit. This piece is touching and personal, dark and disturbing, but in the end pure inspiration. It also reminds its audience that the library is inherently a political space. |
Michael Johnson
Posted on November 14, 2006 at 08:41 PM | Permalink
Review of How To Destroy A Book
This story of a library vandal targeting books perceived to be on gay and lesbian topics and their subsequent transformation into artworks by community members starts out promisingly enough, taking a page from This American Life's style book with interviews backed by music, but after the balance of voice & music star to fall apart, the inconsistent audio quality of the interviewees begins to distance the listener from the material, and the "sountracky" music attempts to lead the listener to a certain emotional conclusion, a job which the voices alone could have done on their own.