Caption: PRX default Piece image
PRX default Piece image 

The new McCarthyism

Series: Times they are a changin' (sort of)
From: Y-Press
Length: 00:02:44

In October of 2001, the US Congress passed the Patriot Act. It allows the government to monitor citizens’ communications and personal information including financial and medical records. To 18 year old Beverly Jenkins, this seems very similar to a popular 1950s mindset called McCarthyism. McCarthyism was a practice, which accused people of being anti-American with limited or no evidence. So it got her thinking, is the Patriot Act the new McCarthyism? Read the full description.
To hear the full audio, sign up for a free PRX account or log in.

More from Y-Press

Piece image

Is Lil Wayne the new Bob Dylan? (00:03:10)
From: Y-Press

Last July, Time’s online editor Josh Tyrangiel said Lil’Waynes rhymes were Dylanesque Dylanesque, as in Bob Dylan, and that got Y-Press journalist Jonathan Gainer ...
Piece image

Apatow vs. Allen (00:05:14)
From: Y-Press

In the world of film, I think Judd Apatow is the new Woody Allen.
Piece image

Integration (00:02:54)
From: Y-Press

Many immigrants come to America looking for a better life with more opportunities. They come with widely varying levels of education and resources. Many times, generational ...
Piece image

Burmese youth refugees (00:03:10)
From: Y-Press

Just over 1000 Burmese refugees settled in Indianapolis last year and that number is projected to grow this year. Carleen Miller, executive director of Exodus Refugee ...
Piece image

Diversity in schools (00:03:03)
From: Y-Press

Census figures indicate that Indianapolis’ population has grown 5 percent over the last decade, which is large part (83.4% of which) is due to the immigrant and refugee ...
Piece image

Immigrant Latino youth activism (00:03:06)
From: Y-Press

This past December, for the second time in the past five years, the DREAM Act did not become a reality. While the initial reaction for some Latino youth activists was ...
Piece image

School violence (00:03:13)
From: Y-Press

Failing neighborhood schools often have neither the support nor resources to turn themselves around. Jesse Sharkey, Vice President of Chicago Teachers Union, says that there ...
Caption: Y-Press Shayan Ahmad and Radio Arte Jen Martinez

Dropouts (00:03:22)
From: Y-Press

Chicago Public Schools only graduates about half of its seniors each year. For some kids finding a school with a more personal touch is the key.
Caption: Y-Press reporter Allison Albrecht and Radio Arte reporter Jerry Curz during a phone interview.

School choice (00:03:14)
From: Y-Press

The Chicago public school system aims to educate half a million kids each year. At this time every year, eighth graders are choosing from career academies, neighborhood, ...
Piece image

School innovations (00:03:32)
From: Y-Press

Chicago Public Schools only graduates about half of its seniors each year. To engage kids and keep them in class, some schools are trying unique and innovative approaches to ...

Piece Description

In October of 2001, the US Congress passed the Patriot Act. It allows the government to monitor citizens’ communications and personal information including financial and medical records.

To me, this seems very similar to a popular 1950s mindset called McCarthyism. McCarthyism was a practice, which accused people of being anti-American with limited or no evidence.

So it got me thinking, is the Patriot Act the new McCarthyism? Historically, the government has enacted policies during times of conflict to protect American society.

IUPUI professor of history and expert in McCarthyism Richard Gantz doesn’t think history repeats itself but says there are some parallels between the Patriot Act and McCarthyism.

Gantz: There are certain trends and certain reactions that Americans typically have. In times of war or particular threats, officials, politicians, and I think the public tend to look the other way and not be concerned and just wink and say well, the times require this sort of response.

Both respond to foreign threats made on America and are intended to protect its citizens; however some argue the cost is basic freedoms.

Toby Haslett, a recent Carmel High School graduate, researched McCarthyism for an in-depth school project. He thinks another parallel is the public’s reaction –fear.

Toby1: There’s supposed to be I think 30 possible nuclear bomb targets within the state of Indiana or that what was thought in the 1950’s. And so right now it was kind of implausible there are 30 terrorist targets within the state of Indiana. As far as that’s concerned that’s obviously a function of fear, people exaggerating the danger of a situation because people are so affected by fear.

Toby, along with senior Rosemary Boeglin, who is president of Carmel’s Amnesty International chapter, says both approaches are problematic. Back in the 1950s, Toby says…

Toby and Rosemary: (Toby) The motivations were justified but the tactics ended up being A: ineffectual and B unjust.

(Rosemary) Which I think is also directly related to the Patriot Act the motivations are not necessarily unjust but the results of they were motivated to do weren’t exactly in line with what’s right.

So is history repeating itself? Is the Patriot Act the new McCarthyism? One is an intricate law and the other is a complex mindset, and both have many fine distinctions and details. I can’t say whether they are the same but both have brought about similar results for similar reasons using very similar tactics. It seems to me the attitude then and now is just the same, only with a new target.

 

For Y-Press I’m Beverly Jenkins