
More from Nieman Program on Narrative Journalism
Rehabbing the Fourth Estate
(00:59:00)
From: Nieman Program on Narrative Journalism
A broadcast special from the Neiman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University.
Norman Mailer: a novelist in a time of war
(00:58:30)
From: Nieman Program on Narrative Journalism
This talk of Norman Mailer's is a broadcast special from the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University.

Piece Description
“Journalists and War” is a broadcast special from the Neiman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. It is hosted by Mark Kramer, the executive director of the Neiman Program on Narrative Journalism at Harvard university. Every year the Program hosts a conference where a thousand working journalists come to Cambridge for one of the largest annual meetings of the journalist community.
This year, war was the primary topic. The situation in Iraq is deteriorating, and for American journalists this means get embedded or get frozen out. Is this a healthy situation for the American public in need of unbiased information? How critical can one be without having one’s patriotism justly called into question? And if a journalist chooses leave out the darker realities of war is he or she then a propagandist? What are the stories war journalists should be telling?
The hour consists of excerpts from three talks given at the 2004 conference.
Seymour Hersh
Molly Bingham
David Finkel
Here is a link to a page with bios/photos for each speaker:
http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/events/conferences/narrative2004/bios.html

4 Comments
|
Review of Journalists and WarFor Sy Hersh alone, this is worthy of broadcast anywhere for anyone who wonders at the quality of information offered by this administration. In particular, I think the plea for the moral foundation of journalistic endeavor is vital in this day and age. The "one-the-handism" that we have used to characterize "fair journalism" is, in the fortuitous words of the late Ron Ziegler, inoperative in this environment. Sometimes, we don't have to present the so-called balanced view. I don't remember stations presenting Jeffrey Dahlmer's POV on his story; what should be different in this circumstance? |
|
Review of Journalists and WarSomebody's gotta report on the reporters – especially when so many reporters are repeating, not reporting. Here's an invitation to look inside the business, from Nieman writer-in-residence Mark Kramer. His program on Narrative is the shining star of Harvard's journalism, this excerpt the best primer NDs can use to arm listeners to think for themselves. Because the old, and new, "mainstream" media – the New York Times (unvetted WMD reports), CBS Television (fabricated National Guard documents), Slate.com (purloined, uncalibrated exit polls posted during voting hours) – have demonstrated themselves lazy, self-promotional, partisan. NPR News isn't immune either. Reviewing recent coverage, Ombud Jeffrey Dvorkin wrote, "NPR sounded as though it were reporting on behalf of the White House, not about the White House." Local stations should rush to the breach with "Journalists and War". Listeners eavesdrop as three top reporters address their peers, with yeoman field work by Benjamen Walker coaxing good sound out of cathedral-sized ballrooms. The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh leads off and hits hard. How did they take over the government? [That's] the question we should be asking, [how did] eight or nine neo-conservatives, people considered to be whackos for the last ten years, suddenly take over [and] the Press [is] basically supine -- or prone. Hersh's presentation doesn't disguise his politics, and his journalism relies, understandably but unfortunately, on nearly uniformly anonymous sources. But the work has proved out over 30 years (on one occasion here he confuses Baghdad with Saigon). And most – he knows that story is crucial to effective journalism – the point of the Nieman Narrative program. When Jay Allison presented at the 2003 conference, the room was filled with print journalists who seemed stunned that storytelling was part of their job. That's part of the problem. Photographer Molly Bingham and The Washington Post's David Finkel - (on the ground, unembedded) follow Hersh with more real reportage, and a mantra from inspired editors -- Go, see, witness, tell us what's going on – and assume that the readers are intelligent enough to figure out what the truth means to them. NDs, schedule "Journalists and War" at year's end to help defrock those glib Year-in-Review programs so listeners can make a New Year's resolution: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice... |





Michael Stewart
Posted on March 15, 2005 at 03:23 PM | Permalink
Review of Journalists and War
This piece speaks to the heart of the problem journalists are facing in Iraq and Washington. It illuminates the manipulation of the press at home and on the frontlines of the conflict, by the Bush administration and the military. Furthermore, Journalists and War, reaffirms the importance of a free press, especially during armed conflict. Through the featured speakers we are given a window into the intrigue and politics of the war in Iraq and the harsh realities on the ground of the conflict.